Search can retrieve enormous amounts of general information. That abundance makes undifferentiated summaries less valuable. What remains scarce is context tied to actual practice: why a professional chooses one path over another, what tends to fail, which dependencies matter, and what patterns become visible after repeated experience.
Human expertise is not automatically correct, but it is a distinct source category. It can reveal original observations and operational knowledge that do not exist in public documentation. External sources can then validate, qualify, or contextualize propositions that require broader evidence.
Google’s people-first guidance explicitly values first-hand expertise. The relevant opportunity is not to produce artificial expert-sounding prose, but to document real people whose work gives them something specific to explain.
Dominator’s interview and source process turns that expertise into a durable record: attributable, reviewable, connected to evidence, and maintainable after the original conversation ends.
In a world of abundant generated summaries, documented human experience becomes more—not less—important because it provides the source material from which genuinely differentiated explanations can be built.